 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  Comparing ship's size
|
Browsing this Thread:
41 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
 1 |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Threaded
Newest First| Poster | Thread | Rated: 1 Votes |
|---|
|
Comparing ship's size | #1 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
Just how big was Titanic? (in meters not feet) And can someone perhaps give an indication how this compares to the Queen Elizabeth 2? I have always thought that both are relatively alike in length. I may be wrong. And would 1 inch thick hull plating provide any protection in a head-on collition?
 |
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 15:27
  |
  |
||
clinton
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #2 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Titanic was 269 metres long. To change metres into feet u use 3.28 divide or multiply depending on what u need to do. I dont have the QE2's length handy so I can't say.
cya |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 15:58
|
|
|||
Visit Website
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
mmm not bad for a credit 3 boi eh
 |
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 16:02
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #4 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
To bad u didn't know that credit 2 boy
Boi ahahahahah boy maybe zingggggggg the QE2 is bigger than Titanic just found out, though I think Titanic liiks bigger, but anyway, has anyone else heard of this queen victoria ship coming. Titanic even with 1 inch deep steel still could of tacken a head on colision. |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 16:08
|
|
|||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #5 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Lets not stray form the subject eh
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 17:24
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #6 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Indeed, but if you pay attention you may notice in that post i said my part and then put the discussion bac on trac, to discuss the topic headin.
Check mate |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 17:31
|
|
|||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #7 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Lets not go into detail now
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 17:46
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #8 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Just so long as U know
|
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 18:04
|
|
|||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #9 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
ok, was the titanic broader than olympic, about 120 m or so
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 18:09
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #10 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Maybe half an inch or so, lol
Britannic was broadest lol, Though how much bigger is the QM2 to the QE2? |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 18:18
|
|
|||
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
1 |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
