Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic Cunard Line |
Browsing this Thread:
110 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 3 ... |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #21 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Desent thing, ahahahahahaha descent maybe, this is gettin old now, perhaps we should continue this over tea |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/4 21:07
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #22 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yes lets shall we young chap , this is getting to just chit chat now
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/4 21:08
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #23 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Indeed, we shall,
how long will it be untill Cunard re-coup the entire cost of the QM2 |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/4 21:16
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #24 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
couple of years i think, they put alot of money into the ship
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/19 16:18
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #25 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Yes somewhere in the region of $800,000,000.
|
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/19 17:02
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #27 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
For that you could re-build the Olympic and Titanic, and perhaps Britannic. Atleast if you consider the cost of the original in todays terms but of cource, they will need a triple hull, computer's, better steal etc. but If i was cunard I would of built on, on the Olympic class design and call it Gigantic, the britannics original name, and make it about 1200 feet long. that would of been really good.
|
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/19 18:32
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #28 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yeah , it would be alot better than a cruise ship and would boost the publics interest in the ships
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/19 18:44
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #29 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/1
From East Midlands
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Just to go back to the topic of the Queen Victoria, yes cunard are building it,
|
||
_________________
Helm, Warp 1 Engage |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/13 10:13
|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #30 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
umm...we know that.
I think that 1200 ft. might be a little long. don't you? I mean, the structure of the ships back then weren't extremely sturdy. Ithink that with today's technology it would be alright. and what do you mean the QM2 lost $800 mil.? |
||
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/13 11:23
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 3 ... |
|