 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  Going back in time...
|
Browsing this Thread:
14 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
 1 |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Threaded
Newest First| Poster | Thread | Rated: 2 Votes |
|---|
|
Going back in time... | #1 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
If you had the chance to go back in time and sail on any passenger ship, which ship would you choose and why?
 |
||
Posted on: 2005/3/23 8:37
  |
  |
||
clinton
|
Re: Going back in time... | #2 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/11/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Queen Mary. That was the luxury liner to top all luxury liners. In my opinion, it still is. With todays cruise market trying to appeal to EVERYONE, they have to make some compromises in terms of luxury. (Fake wood, laminate flooring, etc...) The Ocean Liners of the day appealed to ther rich and famous, and no compromises were taken in the first class sections of the ship. Most of the rooms on ships today are somewhat between first and second class. Nothing compares to the beauty of the ships in the glory days of ocean liners.
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/23 18:22
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #3 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2004/11/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Also, you can still go on the Queen Mary, which I have.
http://www.queenmary.com |
||
Posted on: 2005/3/23 18:23
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #4 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
olympic just because it was the largest vessel of its time back then
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/23 19:45
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #5 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
They should never have scrapped the Olympic. They should have restored her like the Queen Mary
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/24 8:08
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #6 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Yes but the Olympic was crumbling, and they didn't have a need for her. I would have gone on the Olympic because it was larger
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/3/24 19:46
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #7 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I am confused. Wasn't the Titanic marginally larger than Olympic?
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/30 14:25
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #8 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yes it was, olympic was the largest vessel then titanic came and took its crown but it wasn't much bigger.
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/30 16:18
|
|
||
|
Re: Going back in time... | #9 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Titanic was heavier, that's all, they where the same size.
|
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/30 16:27
|
|
|||
Visit Website
|
Re: Going back in time... | #10 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yeah but wasn't one at least one milimetre bigger than the other lol
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/30 16:56
|
|
||
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
1 |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
