 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner?
|
Browsing this Thread:
163 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
 3 |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Threaded
Newest First| Poster | Thread | Rated: 1 Votes |
|---|
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #21 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
that's true. i just think theat they weren't prepaired nad in my mind they paid the ultimate consequence
ttyl |
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 11:01
  |
  |
||
edward9139
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #22 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
That's a fair point, and there is some evidence to support that. Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
|
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 11:03
|
|
|||
Visit Website
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #23 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
See that impetator mentioned earlier, is that not the same ship cunard called Berengaria, or something like that? And is it true that the decrative eagel on the bow was put in there to try and make it the longest liner in the world which she just missed being?
|
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 11:27
|
|
|||
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #24 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Yes; and, allegedly yes. Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
|
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 11:31
|
|
|||
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #25 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
what ship r we talking about now?
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 15:05
|
|
||
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #26 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Hello, Bell asked above if the Imperator (which I mentioned on another thread, if I remember rightly, so I'm not sure why Bell asked it here) was the same as Cunard's Berengaria. I said yes, as the Imperator was renamed Berengaria. The posts are directly above, so I am at a loss to know how you are confused about it. Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
|
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 15:13
|
|
|||
|
Re: Why didn't the crew see the iceberg sooner? | #27 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I must of got mixed up my apologies, anyway did the board of trade not call for ships to have binoculars for the look out's or was that just down to the company if they wanted to use them or not?
|
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/5/28 14:21
|
|
|||
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
3 |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
