Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic movie This is rude but WHAT THE HECK IS THE CAR SCENE FOR?!! |
Browsing this Thread:
9 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
#2 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
They had sex in the car, that was the whole point.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/5/17 15:32
|
|
#3 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/8
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
What is it for though! There is no point of it!
|
||
Posted on: 2004/5/17 22:50
|
|
#4 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
Sure there is. it's called SEX!
|
||
Posted on: 2004/5/17 23:13
|
|
#5 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/8
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I know what its called, but, Ok how about this: who hear thinks the scene should be there. I think no.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/5/18 22:55
|
|
#6 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
If you're saying it adds nothing to the story, you're right!
|
||
Posted on: 2004/5/18 23:03
|
|
#7 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/4/15
From Temecula, California city of red light runners
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
TTF is right. It adds nothing to the actual story but it shows the consumation of the relationship. In a lot of love stories/chick flicks, the couple in question has sex at some point. While adding nothing to the actual plot, it's just a way to show how much love they had for another.
PS I'm not saying that the [u:9c2cf7f53b]only[/u:9c2cf7f53b] way to show love is physically but for a romantic movie, that's just how it gets done |
||
Posted on: 2004/5/22 18:10
|
|
#8 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
Well, up until that point I found the movie marginally possible, despite the fact Freud's books weren't available befor the '20s. But [i:6db0f75875]no way[/i:6db0f75875] would a girl 1) be running around sans chaperone (the parents weren't [i:6db0f75875]stupid[/i:6db0f75875], and 2) lose her virginity to someone she had known on and off for 2 days.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/5/23 17:54
|
|
#9 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/11/6
From Tallmadge, Ohio
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Yea, good point. I thought back then they married more for stability, and not so much for love...so I kinda thought the whole thing about leaving Cal was kinda ....odd.... :)
|
|||
Posted on: 2004/5/25 12:41
|
|
#10 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
The entire thing is...odd...actually, how about howlingly implausible? There would be no way Jack could sneak into First Class - to do so whould but [i:7b5c3eb59b]the entire ship[/i:7b5c3eb59b] in danger of being quarantined at WSL expense in New York; Freud's theories weren't even published until the 1920's, and the [i:7b5c3eb59b]idea[/i:7b5c3eb59b] a nicely-brought-up girl of her time would even know what a penis [i:7b5c3eb59b]was[/i:7b5c3eb59b] is rediculous ("Close your eyes and think of England" was a popular mother-daughter peice of advice on daughter's wedding night); a man could still legitimately get an annullment and keep the woman's dowery in several states and the UK if he found her not a virgin on their wedding night - need I go on? What Cameron did was take two people with 1990s attitudes and stuck them in 1912.
I have absolutely no doubt in 20 years or so this movie is going to be considered a howler for the numerous discrepancies. Personally, I watch it with the sound off because the sets are dead-on accurate and the CGI is phenomenal. But the plot line is unrealistic and carries too many glaring temporal errors for me to enjoy it. |
||
Posted on: 2004/5/25 15:23
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 |
|