Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic Do you think |
Browsing this Thread:
6 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 2 |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
#11 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/8/3
From Tallmadge, Ohio
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
LOL...I know....lol
|
|||
_________________
I'm not Kate Winslet OR Rose DeWitt Bukater.... please stop sending me fan mail! My Website.. Titanic: Truth, Myths and Legends |
||||
Posted on: 2004/8/22 2:22
|
|
#12 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/6/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
With friends like you nosie Rosie who needs ememys? LoL collie
|
|||
Posted on: 2004/8/23 10:27
|
|
#13 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/8/3
From Tallmadge, Ohio
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
hahaha....enemies are bad.....friends like me are GOOD!
|
|||
_________________
I'm not Kate Winslet OR Rose DeWitt Bukater.... please stop sending me fan mail! My Website.. Titanic: Truth, Myths and Legends |
||||
Posted on: 2004/8/23 22:00
|
|
#15 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/8/3
From Tallmadge, Ohio
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
It's very cold in there. That'd be a great preservation method. Also, not many ocean creatures would like to be in that cold of an atmosphere. Although, you do run the chance of getting some unheard of creatures in there too. I think in normal circumstances, it would have preserved just fine, but it having been almost 100 years, I don't think much WOULD be left to run DNA testing on if anything.
|
|||
_________________
I'm not Kate Winslet OR Rose DeWitt Bukater.... please stop sending me fan mail! My Website.. Titanic: Truth, Myths and Legends |
||||
Posted on: 2004/8/24 22:03
|
|
#16 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/6/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Betty, At one time they thought that the ship and bodys would be fully preseved because it was that far down and they didnt think any forms of live would survived at those depts but they were wrong so i wonder if what you heard or saw was before they had the information thats now available.
|
|||
Posted on: 2004/8/25 10:42
|
|
#17 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/4/4
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Isn't the bow like 60 feet (I think tha'ts hwat I remember hearing) buried in mud??
|
||
Posted on: 2004/8/25 12:06
|
|
#18 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/6/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Im not sure i thought that it was thirty feet but you may be correct . I read that the silt on the ocean floor is like stomach acid and eats away all human remains is this true?
|
|||
Posted on: 2004/8/25 14:16
|
|
#19 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/8/9
From somewhere deep down
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
thats what i read today in the books (im getting smarter). it is doing that. you are correct rosie.
|
||
_________________
"I am too involved now." - Jack ~ ~ "To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world." ~ ~ http://profiles.myspace.com/users/12108709 |
|||
Posted on: 2004/8/29 7:58
|
|
#20 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/12
From Albany, New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Yes, Rosie while looking through my books the other day, I did see where the bow was buried 60 feet under the sand(?). I wonder why things would be preserved in the bow. Is it because it is like a vacuum or something in the part buried? I wish I could find the article I was talking to you all about. I am still looking. I almost think it was Ballard talking on a documentary, but I will keep at it
|
||
Posted on: 2004/8/29 12:46
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 2 |
|