Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic news
  Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !

Browsing this Thread:   2 Anonymous Users

 

 Bottom   Previous Topic   Next Topic
2
...

  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread Rated:  8 Votes
  •  rose89
      rose89
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#11

Joined: 2004/8/9
From somewhere deep down
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
wasnt olympic scrapped?
_________________
"I am too involved now."
- Jack
~ ~
"To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world."
~ ~
http://profiles.myspace.com/users/12108709
Posted on: 2004/10/19 0:39
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  TitanicSmart
      TitanicSmart
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#12

Joined: 2004/10/18
From Texas
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
no, the olympic was not scrapped
Posted on: 2004/10/29 20:37
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  rose89
      rose89
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#13

Joined: 2004/8/9
From somewhere deep down
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
what happened to her then? sorry im not informed about her.
_________________
"I am too involved now."
- Jack
~ ~
"To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world."
~ ~
http://profiles.myspace.com/users/12108709
Posted on: 2004/10/30 0:40
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  SiouxFalls76
      SiouxFalls76
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#14

Joined: 2004/10/26
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
i've read books about the titanic and her sister ships....there is nothing on the hulls to tell you which ship it is except their names...they way to tell them about is my the propellers...the books that i have read tell that there is a number on the one of the propellers, on all three ships, to tell the difference between them....yes the titanic and the oylmpic looked alike but why would they send out the olympic on the titanic's maiden voyage?Quote:

Posted on: 2004/10/31 18:11
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  rose89
      rose89
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#15

Joined: 2004/8/9
From somewhere deep down
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
oh. i thought olympic was just a little bit shorter than the titanic and had a little differences in the modeling.
_________________
"I am too involved now."
- Jack
~ ~
"To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world."
~ ~
http://profiles.myspace.com/users/12108709
Posted on: 2004/10/31 18:16
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Titanicluvr91
      Titanicluvr91
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#16

Joined: 2004/8/2
From Chester,VA,USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

rose89 wrote:
oh. i thought olympic was just a little bit shorter than the titanic and had a little differences in the modeling.

I thought so too...
Posted on: 2004/10/31 18:47
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  rose89
      rose89
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#17

Joined: 2004/8/9
From somewhere deep down
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
anybody here know???
_________________
"I am too involved now."
- Jack
~ ~
"To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world."
~ ~
http://profiles.myspace.com/users/12108709
Posted on: 2004/10/31 20:28
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Titanicluvr91
      Titanicluvr91
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#18

Joined: 2004/8/2
From Chester,VA,USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
I'll do some research in a minute and get back and tell y'all in soon as I can.
Well i will when I get back from the store.
Posted on: 2004/10/31 20:42
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Titanicluvr91
      Titanicluvr91
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#19

Joined: 2004/8/2
From Chester,VA,USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Lengths and Widths

Olympic:
882.5 feet long
92.5 feet wide

http://members.aol.com/wile129/olympic.htm

Titanic:
882.6 feet long
92.6 feet wide
http://members.aol.com/wile129/statistics.htm

So, Titanic was .1 foot longer and wider than Titanic.
Posted on: 2004/10/31 23:14
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  rose89
      rose89
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank !
#20

Joined: 2004/8/9
From somewhere deep down
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
from what ive heard, im not arguing, titanic was at least 10 ft longer.
_________________
"I am too involved now."
- Jack
~ ~
"To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world."
~ ~
http://profiles.myspace.com/users/12108709
Posted on: 2004/11/1 5:13
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic
2
...


 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box