Yeah if you were a ship and you thought you had missed it and went by it, you were wrong looking at the third link, it shows that you could still hit it from underneath and not know anything.

You can see from these photos of actual bergs how easy it would be to ride up on the submerged portion even on a near miss collision.

http://photobucket.com/albums/v607/sundancekid17/Iceberg/?action=view¤t=blockiceberg2.jpg
http://photobucket.com/albums/v607/sundancekid17/Iceberg/?action=view¤t=101Iceberg.jpg
http://photobucket.com/albums/v607/sundancekid17/Iceberg/?action=view¤t=iceberg.jpg

gtg till later. I'll be back around 7:00 P.M. i think

no problem, it was ginormous.

but the real size didn't show because most of it was underwater

i didn't know they weighed that much. thanks for the info. i've just been using the posts to discuss becausse people hardly look at their inbox notifications

No No ppl i'm just saying lets get to the topic at hand

Icebergs float because the density of ice (around 900 kg per cubic meter) is lower than that of seawater (around 1025 kg per cubic meter). The ratio of these densities tells us that 7/8 of the iceberg's mass must be below water. Usually icebergs are 20% to 30% longer under the water than above and not quite as deep as they are long at the waterline.

the weight of an iceberg is as follows

Categories of iceberg sizes which are used for recording iceberg statistics range from very large greater than 10 million tonnes

The iceberg that struck titanic was very large indeed, there was no way titanic was going to samsh through this beast

g'day

Now wait just a damm minute, johno, u are one to talk, as far as the chit-chat goes, you are just as at fault as anyone else, so I don't see where you are coming from

now this is my last post for a while, am in a bad mood now, that is a greate send off ehhh

good day

send bell a pm and ask him that and not post it in discussions

how come you don't have an avatar?