Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic news New Titanic |
Browsing this Thread:
19 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 2 ... |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread | Rated: 3 Votes |
---|
|
Re: New Titanic | #58 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I agree with ozone being clear, but what you mean about 'out of the blue'. What where yoy expecting?
|
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/4/10 19:40
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #56 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
according to the site moderator that whitestar05 guy was just a scam and the titanic2 won't be built.
good night |
||
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/7 21:21
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #55 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/30
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I doubt you will ever see a ship that suffered bad luck as Titanic ever be glorified with a second ship of that name. If you know any sailors or seamen you would know that is one of the biggest superstitions ppl of the ocean have. Bad luck! Never even change the name is equally taboo. I think the Titanic is still revered as a finail resting place for many and that would not be proper to exploit. But the all might dollar can make a man do a many a thing.
|
||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 21:39
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #54 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
i still think an olympic 2 would be a good idea
|
||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 16:06
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #53 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Not untill it was legally sorted etc, it's complicated, so if it was on the news then it would be mere speculation, to fill a slow news day, but news is cumin thick and fast the now,
|
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 16:03
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #52 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
guess so bell
If there is a new titanic getting built, wouldn't it be all over the news as such |
||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 16:01
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #51 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Yep so there was no need for the initial comment.
|
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 15:59
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #50 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Hi guys
Bells right but i do not see why someone would argue with the fact that they were sister ships. Edward seemed to give a point that they were just sisters. i doubt anyone would disagree that they were sisters. |
||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 15:56
|
|
Re: New Titanic | #49 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I know they are sister ship's. I asked, has anyone said they where not, which is what you seemed to imply.
|
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/4/6 12:47
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 2 ... |
|