Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic Rudder theory |
Browsing this Thread:
39 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 5 |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #42 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/7/7
From TITANIC'S DEEPERS
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
ok
|
|||
_________________
A Promise Can't Be Broken.. Even Death Cannot Slit Up The True Love...! |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/9 23:04
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #43 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Hi Titanicsoul,
If you're confused about what I was saying, please feel free to ask and I'll try and explain more clearly. What exactly was your question? Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/10 16:52
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #44 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/10/11
From Maryland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Assumimg she didn't get taken into war, and sunk then. Jessica |
||
Posted on: 2005/11/10 18:46
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #45 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
i hoped the olympic would have survived, she was the biggest liner until titanic took over
a marvelous achievement in history |
||
Posted on: 2005/11/12 11:17
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #46 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Well it did survive, troop transport, never sank and managed to sink an enemy submarine.
and yes titanic took over but only due to some few hundred tons of weight. I am not completley sure but did olympics gross weight not exceed titanics after the modifications to its desing following titanics demise? |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/12 13:25
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #47 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
In 1911, Olympic's gross tonnage was 45,323.82 tons; Titanic's gross tonnage was 46,328 tons in 1912. In 1913, after her 1912-13 refit, Olympic's gross tonnage rose to 46,358 tons (more than Titanic's); and in 1920 Olympic's gross tonnage rose even higher to 46,439 tons (where it remained until 1935). Displacement is a more accurate measure of weight (gross tonnage is actually a measure of enclosed space and not weight, which is confusing since it's called '...tonnage'!), and some sources have Titanic's displacement at 250 tons more than Olympic's in 1912; it depends how heavily loaded a ship is (how much coal it has, how many passengers, etc.) but I believe that Olympic's average displacement would have surpassed Titanic's from 1913. That's a long way of saying that I agree with you, Bell! (SMILE) Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/12 14:15
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #48 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/7/7
From TITANIC'S DEEPERS
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
hahahaha sounds really interesting but i gotta say i'm not very good at maths..! *shy face*
cyaaaa you couple of nerds lol |
|||
_________________
A Promise Can't Be Broken.. Even Death Cannot Slit Up The True Love...! |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/12 19:59
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #49 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Couple? I thought I was the only 'nerd'! (Just joking...not that it's a funny joke of anything.)
I failed a number of maths exams when I was at school...it's something that tends to improve with age (a very slow improvement in my case -- lol). Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/12 20:29
|
|
Re: Rudder theory | #50 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Where are my manors?
Hello Mark nice to hear from you again, how have you been? Yes math’s, it is a tricky subject, so much so I now fear triangles lol dam cosine rule. Anyway, the Titanic rudder WAS big enough by law, so making it bigger; well what would you do that for? Ice-berg? HA no such incident had been foreseen Hindsight yet again Cheerio |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/11/13 1:17
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 5 |
|