 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  Comparing ship's size
|
Browsing this Thread:
45 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
 2 |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Threaded
Oldest First| Poster | Thread | Rated: 1 Votes |
|---|
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #15 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
She is like a brick, no design atall, comeon cunard, make an effirt here, suppose they can with the new Queen Victoria, but I would expect more of the same,
 |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/6/4 22:13
  |
  |
|||
Martyn
Visit Website
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #14 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
She doesn't look like a trans-atlantic queen does she? I mean, the ship's profile is just plain ugly. The bridge and bow looks good but the rest is awful.
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/8 8:21
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #13 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
the qm has disgraced the seven seas
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/2 16:45
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #12 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Thanks for that.
mmm so the QM2 is twice as heavy as the QE2, wonder what the french were doin?  |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/2 15:26
|
|
|||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #11 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
QM2: Length 1132 feet
Beam 135 feet 150,000 gross tons QE2: Lenth 963 feet Beam 105 feet 70,327 tons Titanic: Length 882.5 feet Beam 92.5 feet 46,000 tons (approx.)  |
||
Posted on: 2005/3/2 8:19
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #10 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Maybe half an inch or so, lol
Britannic was broadest lol, Though how much bigger is the QM2 to the QE2? |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 18:18
|
|
|||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #9 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
ok, was the titanic broader than olympic, about 120 m or so
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 18:09
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #8 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Just so long as U know
|
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 18:04
|
|
|||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #7 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Lets not go into detail now
|
||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 17:46
|
|
||
|
Re: Comparing ship's size | #6 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Indeed, but if you pay attention you may notice in that post i said my part and then put the discussion bac on trac, to discuss the topic headin.
Check mate |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/3/1 17:31
|
|
|||
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
2 |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
