 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  Cunard Line
|
Browsing this Thread:
112 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
 ... 7 |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Threaded
Newest First| Poster | Thread |
|---|
|
Re: Cunard Line | #61 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
Of cource, was it in the mid 80s they changed something that was giving the ship problems, I think it was the engines, though I may be mistaking. I saw a picture of the QE2 next to the QM2, there is some size difference is't there.
Good day, |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/4/15 12:32
  |
  |
|||
Martyn
Visit Website
|
Re: Cunard Line | #62 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/1
From East Midlands
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
It was in Oct 1986 that her engines were changed from steam to diesel. But she had her much needed refit in Dec 1994.
|
||
|
_________________
Helm, Warp 1 Engage |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/15 13:44
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #63 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
the queen elizabeth2 is kind of a joke compared with the QM2
|
||
Posted on: 2005/4/15 16:53
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #64 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/3/1
From East Midlands
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
How can you say that. if there was no QE2 there would be no QM2
|
||
|
_________________
Helm, Warp 1 Engage |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/15 17:10
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #65 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
i well kind of but there is no contest between them
QM2 would win hands down |
||
Posted on: 2005/4/15 17:59
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #66 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
QM2 is bigger so i'd hav 2 agree. other than that i don't no much about either of them
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/21 16:11
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #67 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I havn't heard much about the qe2, is it famous
|
||
Posted on: 2005/4/21 19:24
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #68 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
don't know. what was the ship that rolled over on it's side?
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/21 19:52
|
|
||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #69 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
QE2 is a very famous ship, bout the same as the QM2, fact if you have heard of the QE2, chances are you have heard of the QM2. I think it was the S.S normandie that fell on it's side in new york harbour.
cya, |
|||
|
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2005/4/22 18:01
|
|
|||
|
Re: Cunard Line | #70 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
wow must have caused damage
|
||
Posted on: 2005/4/22 18:12
|
|
||
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
... 7 |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
