yea i know what u mean.. but, uhm.. they were in love n i bet they knew somehow it was the right thing, it just happened n there's no shame about it..
it was somethin natural..
ah geesh i dunno how to explain it.. lol


cya girl

OKay, I honestly thought by the time I came back on this site, this topic would have been gone by now!!
This surprises me how long this thread has lasted!

And, no, I dont think they should have. I mean, I do and I don't. To keep up with the fact that he was sort of making a modern day version of the disaster it does fit, and work. But, the year in which this took place was 1912, in which, it would never have happened like that.
So, for what he was trying to accomplish by that scene, it did work for me... but, to keep with the time period like he did with the rest of the movie, it didn't fit.
Do you know what I mean? lol

haha.. i think it was correct to them the fact het had sex, i mean they loved each other so there's no need to say it's not correct or aproppiated..

lol..


cya

It doesn't really matter that much to me. Seeing the recreated hold with the old Renault car was a bonus in my book. However I don't think it could have been that comfortable on the back seat...

I think they should have, it was a good part of the movie, well the whole movie was good, but yeah I dont think them having sex was bad.......

i think it was done well and that it was pretty believable......

That Cammeron fellow should be ashamed of himself!! Naughty boy!!

Let's stick to the topic: I think that the way Cameron filmed the sex scenes was rather tasteful and in no way offensive.

Quote:

I don't believe it... You've been caught out as being a fake and you still deny it. Let me guess, your son knows your usename and your password by some miraculous means... how gullible do you think we are on this site? Just tell the truth for a change...

yeah, people who just say yes and no are so boring.