Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic Biographical research Question: How many of the bodies where recovered ? |
Browsing this Thread:
8 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 2 |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
#12 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
[quote:5c57c8de4e="Starry"]Yeah, she's quite brilliant!! :D [/quote:5c57c8de4e]
well i try my best lol |
||
Posted on: 2004/2/1 13:59
|
|
#13 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/29
From US of A
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Heehee!
How long have you been interested in Titanic Bess? How long have you been researching it? |
||
Posted on: 2004/2/1 16:59
|
|
#14 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
[quote:ed1e7c124b="Starry"]Heehee!
How long have you been interested in Titanic Bess? How long have you been researching it?[/quote:ed1e7c124b] to be honest with you i really cant remember how long i have been interested in it. i have been researching for quite a while, i cant remember exactly |
||
Posted on: 2004/2/1 18:37
|
|
#15 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/29
From US of A
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
That's cool !
Never stop learning! And that was a cool statement you made Will ! :D :wink: :) |
||
Posted on: 2004/2/13 2:25
|
|
#16 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/12
From Albany, New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
From the 306 bodies recovered by Mackay-Bennett:
190 were brought to Halifax Number identified and buried at sea 56 Number UNIDENTIFIED and buried at sea 60 Number identified and brught to Halifax 65 Number NOT IDENTIFIED and brought to Halifax 125 Number embalmed at sea 106 The unloading of the bodies took 3 1/2 hrs. |
||
Posted on: 2004/2/15 20:18
|
|
#17 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/29
From US of A
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Wow. Just reading that I am overwhelmed with the realism of it! I'm glad t hits me hard though, because usually when I hear the news and theyr'e talking about deaths and bombings, I am just so accustomed to it.
Our world is regretfully numb. |
||
Posted on: 2004/2/16 1:15
|
|
#18 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
One of the other reasons so few had been found has to do with water temperature - the colder air forces objects on the surface down. The dispersion rate would have been accelerated by the ship going down too, although from what I've read, there was no suction to speak of.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/2/16 22:58
|
|
#19 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/29
From US of A
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yeah, I dont understand the suction thing really
|
||
Posted on: 2004/2/17 3:05
|
|
#20 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
Usually, when a ship goes down, there is a fair amount of suction as the hull still has air in it, so parts of the ship implode (gets smaller) under water. The main reason the major part of [i:f31f894f1a]Titanic[/i:f31f894f1a] didn't implode was that she was already filled with water, so there was little suction and not an awful lot of people got dragged in. Luckily for Lightoller, among others.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/2/17 3:16
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 2 |
|