I think that it would be a good idea to make a second movie because of the fact that you would be able to see and relize more things about the ship....jack and rose were to real..in real life and in our hearts...

Jack and Rose can only be real in your heart, because even if through some strange way you find a Jack Dawson in history somewhere and a Rose DeWit Bukater somewhere in history.... you will not find them on the passenger list of the Titanic.

i think that would be pretty hard to do since he sank immediately lol Quote:

Wow, okay, that rumor about the story line for the next titanic is SUCH a crock of bull, Hollywood isnt that stupid. However, i'm up for writing a Titanic 2, heck i already am! Respond to let me know what you think.

On the contary, they WERE real! I looked it up, but their places in class were switched. Cameron most likely thought that it'd be more appealing for the chick to have a higher place in class.

ok that sounds really really stupid.....saving jack....wow

They where going to make a new film, based on Roses life, and it was going to be that Jack was picked up by another ship. They where going to use unused footage from the 1997 movie for roses flash backs. But Cameron decided there where too many holes in such a plot and it never made it from the drawing board. As to the person that said Titanic was the most expensive movie ever made they are wrong. Pearl Harbor was the most it was originally cheaper but the costs went up it was more expensive by several million pounds. Titanic was the biggest money maker ever though to give u an idea it made more than all 3 lord of the rings movies put together.

The possibility of a 2nd movie died 6 years ago

i dont know if you are reffering to me but titanic is the most expensive movie ever. it says so in the guiness book of records and i think i can trust that book.

Well am stuned by that but it is established Pearl harbour is more expensive. In fact i can tell u why they say that the acters all took a cut in their pay for it so price probably would be less than Titanic but after u add it all up again pearl harbour is victorious by a long shoot or maybe u are confusing me with the biggest money maker ever which is Titanic. Or maybe the records book is comparing the initial cost but the end cost was a lot higher for both movies especially pearl.

But in either case they are in for a culture shock. The next potter film is rummoerd to be the most expensive yet that is speculation. But this year speilbergs 'War of the worlds' starring the likes of tom cruise is set to enilalate Titanic not only in budjet but in gross. The marketing men have already started the hype and it is't even finished filming which is taking place as I write this
it is set to be almost double Titanics huge Budjet.

Does the guiness book of records give u both budjets if so tell me cause a will need to tell them and get that amended.

As u said u think u can trust them as I have found there not always right.

Good day Bell

well if its true, then why isnt it recorded in the book of records?