Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic historic
  Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?

Browsing this Thread:   59 Anonymous Users

 

 Bottom   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1

  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread Rated:  2 Votes
  •  Captain_Jack
      Captain_Jack
Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#1

Joined: 2005/3/30
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Here's a subject that will spark great debate. Please try a little research before you post so this can be a "educated discussion".
A hint! The answer is available to those who seek.
Posted on: 2005/5/11 17:59
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#2

Joined: 2005/3/26
From Ireland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
The night Titanic sank not all of her watertight bulkheads were closed. And anyway, most of the watertight bulkheads only went up as far as E Deck. Which is unreasonable.
_________________
To the world you are one person, but to one person you are the world.

- ???
Posted on: 2005/5/11 18:52
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  LeoPlumtree
      LeoPlumtree
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#3

Joined: 2005/4/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
I'm not sure, but weren't some of the watertight doors reopened to feed hoses through to aid in pumping?
Posted on: 2005/5/11 18:58
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  edward9139
      edward9139
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#4

Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
no. i don't think they were. does anyone know how many were closed?
Posted on: 2005/5/12 10:19
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  LeoPlumtree
      LeoPlumtree
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#5

Joined: 2005/4/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

LeoPlumtree wrote:
I'm not sure, but weren't some of the watertight doors reopened to feed hoses through to aid in pumping?


I looked around and couldn't find anything to support this...
Posted on: 2005/5/13 2:32
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#6

Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

LeoPlumtree wrote:
Quote:

LeoPlumtree wrote:
I'm not sure, but weren't some of the watertight doors reopened to feed hoses through to aid in pumping?


I looked around and couldn't find anything to support this...


Hello,

Try looking through the British investigation transcripts and report.

Best wishes,

Mark.
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England.
'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.'
Posted on: 2005/5/13 10:41
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#7

Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

TitanicCrazy wrote:
The night Titanic sank not all of her watertight bulkheads were closed. And anyway, most of the watertight bulkheads only went up as far as E Deck. Which is unreasonable.


Hello,

In many ways, it could be said that this was a criticism that only came to prominence in hindsight. Certainly it's undeniable that the watertight subdivision could have been improved, yet there are some aspects of the design that are often overlooked. For instance, the watertight bulkhead stiffeners were placed slightly closer together than Lloyd's requirements, while the plating of the various watertight bulkheads was from 10 to 20 percent thicker than requirements; Edward Wilding belived that the strength of the stiffening of the watertight bulkheads was 50 percent in excess of Lloyd's requirements.

Meanwhile, with regard to the number of main transverse bulkheads required, it was believed that had the Lloyd's requirements been updated for a ship as large as Titanic, then they would have required only thirteen bulkheads instead of the fifteen Titanic had. If we look at the 900-foot Imperator, completed in 1913, she only had twelve main transverse bulkheads -- although her arrangements were more favourable in other respects.

Best wishes,

Mark.
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England.
'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.'
Posted on: 2005/5/13 10:47
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  LeoPlumtree
      LeoPlumtree
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#8

Joined: 2005/4/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
I kinda think there'd been watertight doors open further aft during the course of the sinking.
Posted on: 2005/5/13 23:38
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  edward9139
      edward9139
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#9

Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
uhh...helloo? how many doors were closed?
Posted on: 2005/5/14 1:28
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Captain_Jack
      Captain_Jack
Re: Where the water tight bulk heads closed when Titanic sank?
#10

Joined: 2005/3/30
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

edward9139 wrote:
uhh...helloo? how many doors were closed?

\


OK here is the answer:
Read the transcripts of these two witnesses taken back in 1912 by two of the last men to leave the bunker areas during the investigation of the Titanic sinking. Note when the witness explains how they were ordered to reopen the watertight doors, which ones where left open when the last man left and pay special attention HOW THE WATER ADVANCED through the levels. The height of the bulk heads are total errelavant as the water never had to flood over the top at E-deck it mearing moved in a laterail direction through open doors!

http://www.titanicinquiry.org/BOTInq/BOTInq05Cavell01.html

http://www.titanicinquiry.org/BOTInq/BOTInq05Dillon01.html
Posted on: 2005/5/14 2:58
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1


 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box