King Kong sucks big time. I watched it with friends and nearly chewed through my own wrists just to end it all! And what the hell was Peter Jackson thinking: Giant ape meets Jarassic Park? Kong runs, jumps and flings that leading actress without breaking her neck or a few ribs. Now that defies the law of physics.
Come on guys and girls! What did you think of this crappy movie?

Quote:

I saw it a few days ago and i wouldn't say it sucked big time. Although the start was a tad boring, i thoughrly enjoyed the rest. The ending was brilliant and sad. If u didn't like the first one or don't like the look of the plot with a giant gorilla, i wouldn't advise anyone to see the this film. Many didn't like it but you have to admit the fact that the animation of kong, the atmosphere and the scenery of the early 1900's new york was superb. I'd give it 9/10

*blink*

I thought it was very very good, actually, so... yeah. The animations and the emotions and all that were very, no, EXTREMELY good.

Oh yeah, Roseflower, the point of the movie is: It ISN'T SUPPOSED to make sense, you know.

PS: I'm back after a long disapperance! YAYNESS! *Huggles you all*

The animation was aweful. I admit that Kong's expresions were well done. But everything else seemed "jerky". Jurassic Park's CGI has a more natural flow to it than this Kong movie. And there were action scenes in both films but Kong seemed very "plastic" whereas a movie like Jurassic Park or Dragon Heart was done better and viewing was half the duration time of Kong. People think that longer films are better...not so at all. Need I remind anyone of a movie called Waterworld which at the time was the longest and most expensive film ever and it was a failure of epic proportions. Kevin Costner's career still hasn't recovered.