Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic Titanic Stowaway |
Browsing this Thread:
3 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
#2 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/3/4
From NC, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
It has been assumed that he probably signed on at Southampton just to get a free ride home.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/4/13 14:32
|
|
#3 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/12
From Albany, New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
7th officer,
Thanks, but I still think he could have written an account about it? don't you. Afterall he did get off before Titanic sank and could have written about the ship and/or his trip |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/13 16:41
|
|
#4 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/3/4
From NC, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I believe he did write about it--or was more likely interviewed and was written about--but he didn't have enough to say for a book or anything like that--just a newspaper article. I understand that when he split he happened to take the key to the crow's nest locker with him...(there went the binoculars)....
That key is pictured in several publications with his name associated. |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/15 14:45
|
|
#5 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/3/4
From NC, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Actually, when reading what I wrote above--and I was just being facitious about the binoculars--I thought I'd better clarify. It was the original second officer David Blair who inadvertantly took the key. When Wilde showed up just before departure and bumped Murdock down, who in turn bumped Lightoller from first officer to second, that bumped Blair from second--he didn't like it and decided to leave Titanic for a different assignment--it was HE who took the key to the cabinet in the second officer's cabin which contained the binoculars.
Just wanted to set the record of fact straight here. Incidently, if the binoculars were felt to be really needed, the cabinet could have been easily forced--the mistake (if there was one) was in the decision, not the unavailability. |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/15 14:56
|
|
#6 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/12
From Albany, New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
7th Officer, You do not know where that article is printed, available do you? I would love to read it. Is it in any books? I have read about the key/binoculars situation.
|
||
Posted on: 2004/4/15 17:34
|
|
#7 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/3/4
From NC, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Nope, sorry. I just figure he must have told his story to a paper--everyone else did! More reason is the fact that he is so well known. He is always referred to in most books so their sources must be from somewhere.
Too bad ET is down, I'd bet they have something on him. |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/15 20:27
|
|
#8 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/12
From Albany, New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
7th Officer,
thanks guess that calls for some researc here<LOL> |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/15 20:30
|
|
#9 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Guest_Anonymous
|
Mr John Coffey
He was born on Thursday 3rd January 1889 When the Titanic sank John Coffey was aged 23 years He was married. He lived in Southampton Hampshire England Occupation: Fireman / Stoker He signed-on to the Titanic Engine crew at Southamptonand disembarked at Queenstown He died on Wednesday 12th June 1957. |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/16 1:21
|
|
#10 |
||
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/1/12
From Albany, New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
thanks teamtuna,
for the info on John Coffey |
||
Posted on: 2004/4/16 12:04
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 |
|