 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic movie  Titanic = no sexual chemistry
|
Browsing this Thread:
14 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
 1 |
|
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Threaded
Oldest First| Poster | Thread | Rated: 3 Votes |
|---|
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #35 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/5/9
From Texas
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
i think that they were in love. i believe in love at first sight. I think that it is the most romantic movie in the world.
 |
|||
|
_________________
CURRENT STATUS: smittin |
||||
Posted on: 2005/6/22 19:38
  |
  |
|||
Yaya123
Visit Website
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #34 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
That is absolutely true. I agree 100%. However do you think Jack and Rose loved each other or were they just having a fling?
|
||
Posted on: 2005/6/21 11:14
|
|
||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #33 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/5/9
From Texas
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
I totally agree!!! Being in love is so much better then having sex. |
|||
|
_________________
CURRENT STATUS: smittin |
||||
Posted on: 2005/6/14 13:28
|
|
|||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #32 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/5/9
From Texas
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
That would be a sad Book!!!
That is awful |
|||
|
_________________
CURRENT STATUS: smittin |
||||
Posted on: 2005/6/14 13:25
|
|
|||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #31 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
love is more important than sex. love will kead to the other, but it's more important to love someone than to have sex with them
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/6/9 0:55
|
|
||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #30 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
The fact is: Jack and Rose had no sexual chemistry. They were just looking for a way to pass the time...
|
||
Posted on: 2005/5/25 8:48
|
|
||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #29 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
There was more love in the air if you ask me. There was less sex, more love I suppose. And alot of people probably expected it to be the other way around.
|
||
Posted on: 2005/5/18 8:52
|
|
||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #28 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
that's what i was wondering...that's probly why they gor a 0. cuz they weren't sexual enough with each other
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/5/13 10:05
|
|
||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #27 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/1/8
From London UK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
What do they mean by sexual chemistry? I mean, apart from having sex what more do they mean by Jack and Rose having sexual chemistry?
|
||
Posted on: 2005/5/11 13:23
|
|
||
|
Re: Titanic = no sexual chemistry | #26 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yeah. you don't need to tell me. i'll e-mail it to you.
|
||
|
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/5/8 12:47
|
|
||
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
1 |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
