Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic historic
  Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:

Browsing this Thread:   14 Anonymous Users

 

 Bottom   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1

  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#13

Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Not really part of the same structure so no not really, though the top is exposed to the sun etc which can melt it but it's basically the same, because it's the same temperature.
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P
Posted on: 2005/5/29 18:31
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Johno
      Johno
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#12

Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
yeah underwater an iceberg is massive and really cold, up on the waters surface it is still cold but not as cold underneath. Is the berg thats underwater more tougher and harder
Posted on: 2005/2/23 16:57
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Stardreamer
      Stardreamer
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#11

Joined: 2004/11/2
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

Johno wrote:
yeah but a crazy guy told me it was warm



Probably in comparison to being in the water at those temps, sitting above the water on an iceberg would be 'warmer'.
Posted on: 2005/2/23 16:33
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Johno
      Johno
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#10

Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
mm you have been doing your homework.

who was it that said full steam ahead???
Posted on: 2005/2/21 15:10
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#9

Joined: 2005/2/19
From Philadelphia
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
The proper response to avoiding that iceberg should have been:

Hard to starboard, port shaft all back full, starboard shaft all ahead flank.

This would have made the port shaft pull backwards, the starboard shaft would have kept pushing, this would have decreased the turn radius of the ship.

Not saying this would have avoided the collision, but it would dramatically reduce the chance of it, or at least minimizing damage.
_________________
Jack and Rose are not real people.
Posted on: 2005/2/20 23:47
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Johno
      Johno
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#8

Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
yeah but a crazy guy told me it was warm

Posted on: 2005/2/18 20:21
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#7

Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
I think everyone had the same Idea johno
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P
Posted on: 2005/2/18 17:22
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Johno
      Johno
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#6

Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
icebergs are really cold, if you must know
Posted on: 2005/2/18 16:11
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Nat
      Nat
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#5

Joined: 2003/9/18
From Hastings, England
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
This reminds me of another ship that sunk although I can't remember which one. She hit something and literally toppled over within about half an hour. I think if the Titanic hit the iceberg head on then maybe she would have just 'toppled over' too and an even greater tragedy and loss of life would have happened.
Funny thing is, I don't remember the name of the other ship.
Posted on: 2005/2/3 11:54
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  brian412
      brian412
Re: Hindsight is 20/20 but think if:
#4

Joined: 2005/2/2
From Ohio,United States
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
I really disagree with the head on theory,and believe the best course of action taken was to steer her around the iceberg.
Think about it for a second. First,the iceberg was probably more than hundreds of feet underwater,than it was above the water.
Second,the steel used for Titanic's hull contained Manganese Sulfide,which were imperfections causing the steel to be brittle in cold temperatures. Thus the reason why the hull plates buckled and popped. She was doing at least 20-25 mph when she hit. That is a lot of force for a 47,000 ton ship.Even so,that's probably not enough force to move an iceberg.With this in mind,if she hit the berg head on,the damage would have been greater and she would have sunk within 20-30 minutes.This is considering the fact that the watertight compartments weren't even set up the way they were supposed to be. Like I have heard it said before,it wasn't one big thing that doomed her.It was a lot of little things that sealed her fate.
Posted on: 2005/2/3 2:23
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1


 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box