Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic historic
  who's fault was it that the titanic sank?

Browsing this Thread:   414 Anonymous Users

 

 Bottom   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1
...

  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread Rated:  30 Votes
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#77

Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

gal of titanic wrote:
no one it sank because i hit an iceberg it was nones fault so dont blame if youy dont no what happend


I'm a little confused as to which comments you're responding to? Who disputed that Titanic hit an iceberg? And who said that they did not know what happened?

I agree that an opinion (as regards what we might call a nexus of evidence) needs to be an informed one to have any merit. That is why exchanging views is so useful in increasing our collective knowledge.

Best wishes,

Mark.
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England.
'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.'
Posted on: 2006/12/31 23:11
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#76

Joined: 2006/12/10
From NEW YORK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
it was no ones so dont blame ok
_________________
Titanic (soundtrack)-Theme instrumental
Posted on: 2006/12/31 18:24
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#75

Joined: 2006/12/10
From NEW YORK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
no one it sank because i hit an iceberg it was nones fault so dont blame if youy dont no what happend
_________________
Titanic (soundtrack)-Theme instrumental
Posted on: 2006/12/31 18:23
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#74

Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

MGY Friend wrote:
The scean in Cameron's movie was a little Hollywood, but it did seem to have at least some factual basis.


Absolutely.

Best wishes,

Mark.
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England.
'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.'
Posted on: 2006/12/30 17:48
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#73

Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

TippooTib wrote:
Actually, it was Elisabeth Lines who overheard Ismay talking with Smith about Titanic's early arrival.

Even though that particular incident was not witnessed by any other survivor, Ismay is known to have lied about not knowing if additional boilers were going to be lit that day. (In 1915 multiple survivors testified that Ismay himself told them about those additional boilers being lit.) Ismay's falsehoods regarding the boilers do not inspire much confidence in his similar denial of the truth of the Ismay-Smith conversation.


Absolutely, Achmet. It's unfortunate that is the case, but it's entirely true.

What should always be borne in mind is that -- on top of the inevitable defects in human memory -- some of the witnesses at the enquiries into the disaster had their own reasons why they did not wish to tell the whole truth.

Best wishes,

Mark.
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England.
'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.'
Posted on: 2006/12/30 17:47
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  TippooTib
      TippooTib
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#72

Joined: 2004/4/27
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

Martyn wrote:
Quote:

MGY Friend wrote:
Quote:
U_just_might_sink said: to let all you people know, we are not certian that bruce ismay had that meeting with cpt. smith. its called hollywood people.


Actually, Mrs. Lucean P. Smith stated under testimony that she overheard Ismay talking about the ship's speed when she was sitting by them in the reception room. If I remember correctly, she said Ismay stated "we did better on today"s run than we did yesterday, we will beat the Olympic (her maiden voyage record) and get into New York on Tuesday night".

So the scean in Cameron's movie was a little Hollywood, but it did seem to have at least some factual basis.


Agreed, though Ismay did denie it quite strongly,

Enquiry:

'Did you have occasion to consult with the captain about the speed or movement of the ship' Enquirer (I forget who exactly)

'Never' Ismays rebutle

I guess it is his word against her's to be honest, knowone else heard it (bar smith but he cant exactly say anything) so depends whom you want to believe, Ismay was vilanised by the press and is probably one of the most disliked charectors in recent history.

Martyn


Actually, it was Elisabeth Lines who overheard Ismay talking with Smith about Titanic's early arrival.

Even though that particular incident was not witnessed by any other survivor, Ismay is known to have lied about not knowing if additional boilers were going to be lit that day. (In 1915 multiple survivors testified that Ismay himself told them about those additional boilers being lit.) Ismay's falsehoods regarding the boilers do not inspire much confidence in his similar denial of the truth of the Ismay-Smith conversation.

Achmet
Posted on: 2006/12/23 23:00
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#71

Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

MGY Friend wrote:
Quote:
U_just_might_sink said: to let all you people know, we are not certian that bruce ismay had that meeting with cpt. smith. its called hollywood people.


Actually, Mrs. Lucean P. Smith stated under testimony that she overheard Ismay talking about the ship's speed when she was sitting by them in the reception room. If I remember correctly, she said Ismay stated "we did better on today"s run than we did yesterday, we will beat the Olympic (her maiden voyage record) and get into New York on Tuesday night".

So the scean in Cameron's movie was a little Hollywood, but it did seem to have at least some factual basis.


Agreed, though Ismay did denie it quite strongly,

Enquiry:

'Did you have occasion to consult with the captain about the speed or movement of the ship' Enquirer (I forget who exactly)

'Never' Ismays rebutle

I guess it is his word against her's to be honest, knowone else heard it (bar smith but he cant exactly say anything) so depends whom you want to believe, Ismay was vilanised by the press and is probably one of the most disliked charectors in recent history.

Martyn
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P
Posted on: 2006/12/23 9:42
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  MGY Friend
      MGY Friend
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#70

Joined: 2006/7/7
From New Mexico, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:
U_just_might_sink said: to let all you people know, we are not certian that bruce ismay had that meeting with cpt. smith. its called hollywood people.


Actually, Mrs. Lucean P. Smith stated under testimony that she overheard Ismay talking about the ship's speed when she was sitting by them in the reception room. If I remember correctly, she said Ismay stated "we did better on today"s run than we did yesterday, we will beat the Olympic (her maiden voyage record) and get into New York on Tuesday night".

So the scean in Cameron's movie was a little Hollywood, but it did seem to have at least some factual basis.
_________________
"Why is it the ship beats the waves
when the waves are so many and
the ship is one?
The reason is that ship
has a purpose".

Sir Winston Churchill


www.mrmarshall.proboards62.com
Posted on: 2006/12/22 22:09
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  U_just_might_sink
      U_just_might_sink
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#69

Joined: 2005/7/14
From arizona
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
to let all you people know, we are not certian that bruce ismay had that meeting with cpt. smith. its called hollywood people.
Posted on: 2006/12/22 21:36
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank?
#68

Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

Danbiddle wrote:
In my opinion, there is another reason for the sinking of the Titanic. The ship was actually designed with a rudder similar to the Clipper ships earlier on, and was consequently far smaller than adequate for a ship of Titanic's size.

In comparison to Mauretania and Lusitania, Cunard Line's largest ships (31,000 gross tons compared to Titanic's 46,000), the Titanic's rudder was actually much smaller than the Mauretania's, resulting in a much worse turning ability. This factor, in combination with the clear, calm night meant that there was aprroximately half a mile to avoid the iceberg, and the fact that the Titanic was travelling at full speed as well as the inadequate rudder sealed the fate of the ship.

In addition, Titanic had three propellers, but only the outer two could go into reverse, and the central propeller remianed stopped, and this made it harder to stop the ship.

Murdoch's maneouver was the standard avoidance maneouver of the day, and his reactions to the incident cannot be criticised heavily. Earlier in his career he avoided a collision in Arabia:

During 1903, Murdoch finally reached the stormy and glamorous North Atlantic run as Second Officer of the new liner Arabic. His cool head, quick thinking and professional judgement averted a disaster when a ship was spotted bearing down on the Arabic out of the darkness. He overrided a command from his superior, Officer Fox, to steer hard-a-port, rushing into the wheelhouse, brushing aside the quartermaster and holding the ship on course. The two ships passed within inches of one another. Any alteration in course would have actually caused a collision.

In hindsight, if he had reversed the port propeller and kept the starboard prop in full ahead, the ship could have turned faster, but as it was Murdoch did all he could.

All in all, it boils down to the fact that there is no one reason for the collision, and the fact that throughout the day seven radio messages had been received that indicated an icefield 74 miles across in front of their path. If these had all reached Captain Smith, I am sure he would have reduced speed, no mattter what Ismay may have said.

Sorry for the long post!

Cheers,

Dan


True enough, but as with the number of life boat's, the ships rate of turn was completly acceptable for the time. Infact still is to this day....

Martyn
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P
Posted on: 2006/12/16 17:36
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1
...


 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box