Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic who's fault was it that the titanic sank? |
Browsing this Thread:
414 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 ... |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread | Rated: 30 Votes |
---|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #77 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
I'm a little confused as to which comments you're responding to? Who disputed that Titanic hit an iceberg? And who said that they did not know what happened? I agree that an opinion (as regards what we might call a nexus of evidence) needs to be an informed one to have any merit. That is why exchanging views is so useful in increasing our collective knowledge. Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/31 23:11
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #76 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/12/10
From NEW YORK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
it was no ones so dont blame ok
|
|||
_________________
Titanic (soundtrack)-Theme instrumental |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/31 18:24
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #75 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/12/10
From NEW YORK
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
no one it sank because i hit an iceberg it was nones fault so dont blame if youy dont no what happend
|
|||
_________________
Titanic (soundtrack)-Theme instrumental |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/31 18:23
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #74 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Absolutely. Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/30 17:48
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #73 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Absolutely, Achmet. It's unfortunate that is the case, but it's entirely true. What should always be borne in mind is that -- on top of the inevitable defects in human memory -- some of the witnesses at the enquiries into the disaster had their own reasons why they did not wish to tell the whole truth. Best wishes, Mark. |
|||
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England. 'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.' |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/30 17:47
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #71 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Agreed, though Ismay did denie it quite strongly, Enquiry: 'Did you have occasion to consult with the captain about the speed or movement of the ship' Enquirer (I forget who exactly) 'Never' Ismays rebutle I guess it is his word against her's to be honest, knowone else heard it (bar smith but he cant exactly say anything) so depends whom you want to believe, Ismay was vilanised by the press and is probably one of the most disliked charectors in recent history. Martyn |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/23 9:42
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #70 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/7/7
From New Mexico, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
U_just_might_sink said: to let all you people know, we are not certian that bruce ismay had that meeting with cpt. smith. its called hollywood people. Actually, Mrs. Lucean P. Smith stated under testimony that she overheard Ismay talking about the ship's speed when she was sitting by them in the reception room. If I remember correctly, she said Ismay stated "we did better on today"s run than we did yesterday, we will beat the Olympic (her maiden voyage record) and get into New York on Tuesday night". So the scean in Cameron's movie was a little Hollywood, but it did seem to have at least some factual basis. |
||
_________________
"Why is it the ship beats the waves when the waves are so many and the ship is one? The reason is that ship has a purpose". Sir Winston Churchill www.mrmarshall.proboards62.com |
|||
Posted on: 2006/12/22 22:09
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #69 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/7/14
From arizona
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
to let all you people know, we are not certian that bruce ismay had that meeting with cpt. smith. its called hollywood people.
|
||
Posted on: 2006/12/22 21:36
|
|
Re: who's fault was it that the titanic sank? | #68 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
True enough, but as with the number of life boat's, the ships rate of turn was completly acceptable for the time. Infact still is to this day.... Martyn |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2006/12/16 17:36
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 ... |
|