Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic historic
  the first funnel collapse

Browsing this Thread:   52 Anonymous Users

 

 Bottom   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1

  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread Rated:  1 Votes
  •  Captain Dan
      Captain Dan
Re: the first funnel collapse
#26

Joined: 2007/3/27
From Maryland, United States
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:

MGY Friend wrote:
Quote:
DANNTJ wrote: IF ONLY THEY PUT 10 COMPARTMENTS IN!!! WHY GOD WHY!!!lol


The Titanic actually had 16 watertight compartments. The problem was,

1. The compartment bulkheads (walls) were not high enough,

2. They did not have real watertight tops to them.

So, the ship filled up kind of like when you put water in an icecube tray. When one cube square fills with water, the water then spills over the next one.


Not only did it have sixteen, but I believe that the Olympic class liners were the only one's afloat with that many, and they went up higher than on other vessels as well. At that time, these vessels were the state of the art in safety and design. Only the Titanic's engines were conventional, but they were the state of the art in steam reciprocating engines of the day.

Daniel
Posted on: 2007/4/16 16:14
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  Mac G
      Mac G
Re: the first funnel collapse
#25

Joined: 2007/4/15
From New York
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
If I may, the time the forward funnel fell. Imagine the listing Titanic was to the water. Those chords holding the funnel would have to be very strong to hold it. My idea is they broke due to the weight not being able to be supported.
_________________
"Looked like a rocket sir."

"Yes, I wonder why a ship like that would want to fire a rocket?"

(A Night to Remember, Stone & Gibson)
Posted on: 2007/4/15 5:17
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  MGY Friend
      MGY Friend
Re: the first funnel collapse
#24

Joined: 2006/7/7
From New Mexico, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:
redairborne22 wrote: Well, it was sometime between 21:15-12:45 am when the bulkhead between boiler rooms 5&6 collapsed according to "A Night to Remember" by Walter Lord. Boiler room 5 was the last room known to be damaged (about a 2 foot "gash) past the watertight door theat separated it from Boiler room 6 (foreward) and Boiler room 4 (aft). Funny thing is, when the water reached Boiler room 4 at 1:20, it came up from benaeath the plates in the floor. That's a quite a bit before the "wave" that came near the final plunge.


I'm sorry, I had the wrong boiler room. I was actually refering to boiler room 4, which gave away around 2:10 AM. Charles Pellegrino stated that this is what really started "the final plunge". When this happened, Pellegrino wrote:

"As Titanic's bow plunges under, Scotland Road and other avenues of seepage stop transmitting water aft and send a storm surge forward."
_________________
"Why is it the ship beats the waves
when the waves are so many and
the ship is one?
The reason is that ship
has a purpose".

Sir Winston Churchill


www.mrmarshall.proboards62.com
Posted on: 2007/3/9 3:57
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  redairborne22
      redairborne22
Re: the first funnel collapse
#23

Joined: 2007/1/30
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Well, it was sometime between 21:15-12:45 am when the bulkhead between boiler rooms 5&6 collapsed according to "A Night to Remember" by Walter Lord. Boiler room 5 was the last room known to be damaged (about a 2 foot "gash) past the watertight door theat separated it from Boiler room 6 (foreward) and Boiler room 4 (aft). Funny thing is, when the water reached Boiler room 4 at 1:20, it came up from benaeath the plates in the floor. That's a quite a bit before the "wave" that came near the final plunge.
Posted on: 2007/3/7 21:19
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  MGY Friend
      MGY Friend
Re: the first funnel collapse
#22

Joined: 2006/7/7
From New Mexico, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:
DANNTJ wrote: IF ONLY THEY PUT 10 COMPARTMENTS IN!!! WHY GOD WHY!!!lol


The Titanic actually had 16 watertight compartments. The problem was,

1. The compartment bulkheads (walls) were not high enough,

2. They did not have real watertight tops to them.

So, the ship filled up kind of like when you put water in an icecube tray. When one cube square fills with water, the water then spills over the next one.
_________________
"Why is it the ship beats the waves
when the waves are so many and
the ship is one?
The reason is that ship
has a purpose".

Sir Winston Churchill


www.mrmarshall.proboards62.com
Posted on: 2007/3/7 18:13
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Re: the first funnel collapse
#21

Joined: 2007/1/28
From The Sea
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
IF ONLY THEY PUT 10 COMPARTMENTS IN!!! WHY GOD WHY!!!lol
_________________
Don't be afraid of the dark... be afraid of what it hides...
Posted on: 2007/3/7 17:27
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  MGY Friend
      MGY Friend
Re: the first funnel collapse
#20

Joined: 2006/7/7
From New Mexico, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
If you are refering to the new theories which I am not too informed on, then maybe, I don't know.

However, I have always heared that the wave was cause by a sudden dip in the bow and superstructure, as if one of the bulkheads probably like compartment number 5 or 6, finally gave totally in. That, and the fact that you have all the new entries for water (windows, cargo holds, vents, and soon the staircase).
_________________
"Why is it the ship beats the waves
when the waves are so many and
the ship is one?
The reason is that ship
has a purpose".

Sir Winston Churchill


www.mrmarshall.proboards62.com
Posted on: 2007/3/7 15:57
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  redairborne22
      redairborne22
Re: the first funnel collapse
#19

Joined: 2007/1/30
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Just a thought, but isn't it possible that the "wave" was actually the bow separating and diving under as Titanic broke up? I'm STILL amazed that most of her boilers are still in place, indicating a possible break-up at a shallower angle.
Posted on: 2007/3/7 13:22
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  csxman
      csxman
Re: the first funnel collapse
#18

Joined: 2005/7/21
From Moravia NY
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
i think it was a combination of the expansion piont breaking abd the guy wires snapping. and the wave
sorry guys this forum is odd the new post are in the front i think they are in the back. sorry for the double post!
yea that copuld happen. its a theory anyway.
_________________
Posted on: 2007/3/6 19:59
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
  •  MGY Friend
      MGY Friend
Re: the first funnel collapse
#17

Joined: 2006/7/7
From New Mexico, USA
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
Quote:
. csxman wrote: the expansion point theory. it could happened i dont know. but we must remember that that expansion poit is directly in front of the grand staircase so......


Infront of the staircase, and behind the first funnel right? It seems likely that if the ship "popped opened" up quickly, that that jarring motion could have caused strain on the guidelines. Maybe?
_________________
"Why is it the ship beats the waves
when the waves are so many and
the ship is one?
The reason is that ship
has a purpose".

Sir Winston Churchill


www.mrmarshall.proboards62.com
Posted on: 2007/3/6 15:49
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic
1


 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box