Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic news Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! |
Browsing this Thread:
189 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 ... |
|
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread | Rated: 8 Votes |
---|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #275 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/8/22
From New Jersey
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I read something about that. It sounded pretty convincing but I don't believe it. I think it was because some guy wrote a book saying that it was the Olympic instead of the Titanic that made peoploe wonder. But I don't believe it. The idea is just too complicated and I doubt they would have down all that work just for some weird money thing. It probably would've cost more money to switch the ships than it would've to just let things go the way they were.
sincerely, Kelly. |
||
_________________
Ismay- "But this ship can't sink..." Andrews- "She's made of iron. I assure you she can, and she will. It is of matematical certainty." |
|||
Posted on: 2006/9/2 16:43
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #274 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/8/22
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I'm not a historian or anything, but I've lived a bit of history in my day. I'm quite certain it truly was the TITANIC that sank and not the OLYMPIC. The chill of the air, the salty, stagnant evening and that water, so cold...it freezes memories ya know. The ship was a dream to be embarked upon. The wood was so finely finished you couldn't even feel the grain. The clock on the stairwell, magnificant, but even moreso I felt were the lamps on the knewl posts. This ship was too lavish to be anything other than TITANIC. I love reading your thoughts and the posts on this site. It's great to see that she still lives on in people's ideas and dreams.
|
||
Posted on: 2006/8/22 19:14
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #273 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Five years wasnt it. Quote:
yea but if we imagen for a second they where switched it would be titanic that answered to olympics distress. Though the switch theroy has been done to death. |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2006/7/26 2:52
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #272 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/8/13
From Crooksville,Ohio and Zanesville,Ohio
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
That is absolutely incorrect! Remember Olympic was one of the ships that responded to Titanic's distress calls but was too far away to help.
|
|||
_________________
"Afterwards the people in the lifeboats had nothing to do but wait,wait to live,wait to die,wait for an absolution that would never come." Old Rose |
||||
Posted on: 2006/7/16 18:23
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #271 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/6/30
From Virginia, united states
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
How much time do you think it took too build the titanic
|
||
Posted on: 2006/6/30 18:32
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #270 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/5/31
From California
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Sigh!
|
|||
_________________
Do you know of Dr. Freud, Mr. Ismay? His ideas of the male preoccupation with size might be of particular interest to you -Rose (Kate Winslet) |
||||
Posted on: 2006/6/30 11:16
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #269 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/2/13
From Scotland
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
If you wenyt up to a normal person who was on the street and didn't care about titanic they would still say it was titanic that sank because many ppl have never heard of the other ships and most ppl know something about titanic because they knew there was a film out about it.
|
||
Posted on: 2005/4/10 19:22
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #268 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/14
From New Hampshire
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
yeah. the other 10% either don't care, or they're sitting in a mental rehabilitation institute debating on whether or not to jump.
|
||
_________________
myspace: www.myspace.com/woahitzswazy facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=524623472&ref=profile |
|||
Posted on: 2005/4/10 13:04
|
|
Re: Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank ! | #267 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/3/30
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
You know it, Ballard knows it, I know it and 90% of the group know it was the Titanic that lays the on the ocean floor. The Olympic made its last voyage on the Southampton to New York route and on its return it was laid up at Southampton. In September it was sold to Sir John Jarvis for £100,000. It was then resold to Metal Industries for breaking on the condition that it was done at Jarrow in order to relieve unemployment there. On 19 September 1937 the hulk was towed to Inverkeithing for final demolition.
http://www.ocean-liners.com/ships/olympic.asp They can't dispute that the Olympic was scrapped out with any facts at all just some coincidental issues. This issue is always left mute when the topic of the "Not the Titanic but the Olympic sank!" There are always those that want to perpetuate a conspiracy for one reason or another. You have the group that says man has never walked on the moon, there is the Hangar13 UFO, the Kennedy assassination and you can go on and on. Next will be crop circles of the Titanic. |
||
Posted on: 2005/4/8 16:17
|
Top Previous Topic Next Topic | 1 ... |
|