 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  staying afloat longer?
|
Browsing this Thread:
37 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Flat
Newest First| Poster | Thread |
|---|
|
staying afloat longer? | #1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2004/12/31
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
I read recently that had Murdoch opened the watertight doors sometime after they were closed, that the ship would have started to flood more evenly and would have taken much longer to sink. They might have had as much as 4-6hrs more before she finally went down. Has anybody else heard about this? and if so could you explain in alittle more detail about why this would have been a good thing to do.
 |
|||
Posted on: 2005/1/20 13:38
  |
  |
|||
Ernie
Visit Website| Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|---|---|
 Re: staying afloat longer? |
clinton | 2005/1/20 14:05 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Martyn | 2005/1/20 16:10 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
sundance | 2005/1/20 17:59 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Martyn | 2005/1/20 21:18 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
clinton | 2005/1/21 8:27 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Ernie | 2005/1/21 10:55 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Ernie | 2005/1/21 10:47 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Ernie | 2005/1/21 11:06 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
sundance | 2005/1/21 17:27 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Ernie | 2005/1/22 11:06 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Ernie | 2005/1/22 11:23 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
sundance | 2005/1/22 18:27 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
Martyn | 2005/1/23 18:25 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
bigboat | 2005/1/24 22:41 |
| Re: staying afloat longer? |
sundance | 2005/1/25 3:33 |
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
