Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic historic
   Conspiricy theories

Browsing this Thread:   63 Anonymous Users

 

  Bottom    Previous Topic    Next Topic
  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread
Re: Conspiricy theories
#1

Joined: 2003/9/14
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
My own views as to the conspiracy theory are well-known. I don't think it stands up to scrutiny at all, and the cynic in me leans toward the viewpoint that it is a theory published with the view to making a large amount of money.

I wanted to post a link to an interview, where a number of points about the conspiracy theory are discussed. It's on my website:

http://www.markchirnside.co.uk/MARK%20CHIRNSIDE%20INTERVIEW%20JUNE%202004.htm

Extract:
Quote:
'On the afternoon of Tuesday June 22nd 2004, I was interviewed for Sky 1’s then upcoming documentary on author Robin Gardiner’s ‘switch’ – or ‘conspiracy’ – theory, which explored whether the Olympic and the Titanic were swapped as part of an insurance fraud. While the documentary first aired in September 2004, due to the nature of television documentaries much material from the various interviewees did not make the final version, and none of my own interview ended up being shown.

Prior to the interview, Richard Sanders of Sky TV had sent me a list of general and specific questions regarding my views on various aspects of the theory. In order to get my thoughts together for the interview, which was loosely based on the list of questions I had been sent, I made the following notes. Some of my answers are deliberately brief, although I followed them up more fully during the interview itself. They are presented here in the event that they are of interest to any readers, and as part of an effort to ensure that the material is not wasted. Prior to the interview, we enjoyed a very interesting and wide-ranging discussion, ranging from all things maritime, to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s 1966 World Cup football team, the fall of France in 1940, and the tragic present-day situation in Iraq.

For anyone interested in reading more about the theory itself, by far the best book that I can recommend is Bruce Beveridge and Steve Hall’s Olympic & Titanic: The Truth Behind The Conspiracy, which was published by Six Star Publishing on March 26th 2004. I consider myself honoured that I was able to offer some small assistance with the Olympic’s history. In my view, the photographic evidence presented in the book – as to the differences between the two ships – is overwhelming and proves once and for all that the two ships were not swapped, and that the ship that sank in the North Atlantic on April 15th 1912 was indeed the Titanic....'
_________________
Mark Chirnside, Warwickshire, England.
'RMS Olympic: Titanic's Sister.'
Posted on: 2005/11/16 10:20
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Subject Poster Date
     Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/15 22:43
       Re: Conspiricy theories Jillian 2005/11/16 0:59
         Re: Conspiricy theories TITANICsoul 2005/11/16 1:42
           Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/16 10:20
             Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/16 19:37
               Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/16 20:17
                 Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/16 20:48
                   Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/16 21:06
                     Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/16 21:43
                       Re: Conspiricy theories TITANICsoul 2005/11/17 0:18
                         Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 12:07
                           Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/17 12:37
                             Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 12:54
                               Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/17 13:05
                                 Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 13:43
                                   Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 14:37
                                     Re: Conspiricy theories calfoley84 2005/11/17 17:21
                                       Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/17 17:31
                                         Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 17:44
                                           Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/17 18:31
                                             Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 19:39
                                               Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/17 19:44
                                                 Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 20:13
                                                   Re: Conspiricy theories TITANICsoul 2005/11/17 21:48
                                                     Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/17 22:16
                                                       Re: Conspiricy theories TITANICsoul 2005/11/18 6:06
                                                         Re: Conspiricy theories S-Park 2005/11/18 10:58
                                                           Re: Conspiricy theories TITANICsoul 2005/11/18 16:13
                       Re: Conspiricy theories Mark Chirnside 2005/11/17 12:33
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic

 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box