 Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic  rushed
|
Browsing this Thread:
17 Anonymous Users
 Bottom  Previous Topic  Next Topic |
|
|
|
|---|
Topic options
Flat
Newest First| Poster | Thread | Rated: 1 Votes |
|---|
|
Re: rushed | #1 |
|
|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2006/4/15
From East Coast
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users  |
I believe it most likely was - the ship was doomed from the start, so many things were working against it.
Granted hindsight is only 20 20 - but for gods sake the rutter was even to small for the ship. Harland and Wolf were so money hungry at one point after the Olympic was damaged they took parts from the Titanic to get the Olympic running again so they wouldn;t lose any more money ... what does that say about the company? Niether the Titanic,Birtanic of Olympic stood the test of time well. 2 of the 3 sank, and Olympic was deconstucted for the final time in 1935. So again what does that say? With all the history surrounding it one might think they would have kept the Olympic around. |
||
Posted on: 2006/4/16 3:44
  |
  |
||
silverFire| Subject | Poster | Date |
|---|---|---|
 Re: rushed |
Martyn | 2006/4/11 11:33 |
| Re: rushed |
Martyn | 2006/4/11 14:55 |
| Re: rushed |
jpmorgan | 2006/4/11 18:27 |
| Re: rushed |
Martyn | 2006/4/12 14:37 |
| Re: rushed |
silverFire | 2006/4/16 3:44 |
| Re: rushed |
Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/16 3:56 |
| Re: rushed |
Martyn | 2006/4/16 10:34 |
| Re: rushed |
Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/16 15:59 |
| Re: rushed |
Martyn | 2006/4/18 17:25 |
| Re: rushed |
Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/18 17:45 |
| Re: rushed |
rip1912 | 2006/4/19 17:56 |
| Re: rushed |
Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/19 18:30 |
 Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
 |
|
You cannot start a new topic.
You can view topic.
