Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic rushed |
Browsing this Thread:
16 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic |
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread | Rated: 1 Votes |
---|
|
Re: rushed | #1 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/1/2
From United Kingdom
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
I would of thought getting Olympic back out to sea would be the sensible thing to do, Titanic didnt need these parts at the time, get them on Olympic, make Titanic its new part, I mean its the sensible thing to do.
Olympic, well she lasted 24 odd years, survived the war, and was still in good condition, at the time of scraping, she unlike her modern counterparts, wasnt sprayed with anti corrosive compounds etc. In terms of keeping her....Doubtfall, She Would no doubt be Destroyed in the war, by the germans, or even the brits who needed the scrap iron. You may argue, well they kept Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth, but remember, they still ran in service after the war. Keeping Olympic would be a costly exercise with no real benifit, and also, what kind of tribute is that, sister ship of the doomed Titanic. Olympic would just be in her sisters shadow |
|||
_________________
Where the hell did my 1800 posts GO!!!!????? :P |
||||
Posted on: 2006/4/16 10:34
|
Subject | Poster | Date |
---|---|---|
Re: rushed | Martyn | 2006/4/11 11:33 |
Re: rushed | Martyn | 2006/4/11 14:55 |
Re: rushed | jpmorgan | 2006/4/11 18:27 |
Re: rushed | Martyn | 2006/4/12 14:37 |
Re: rushed | silverFire | 2006/4/16 3:44 |
Re: rushed | Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/16 3:56 |
Re: rushed | Martyn | 2006/4/16 10:34 |
Re: rushed | Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/16 15:59 |
Re: rushed | Martyn | 2006/4/18 17:25 |
Re: rushed | Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/18 17:45 |
Re: rushed | rip1912 | 2006/4/19 17:56 |
Re: rushed | Mark Passwaters | 2006/4/19 18:30 |
Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
|