Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index Titanic historic faster or slower? |
Browsing this Thread:
10 Anonymous Users
Bottom Previous Topic Next Topic |
|
|
---|
Poster | Thread |
---|
|
Re: faster or slower? | #1 |
|
---|---|---|---|
Joined: 2005/4/23
From
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users |
Quote:
Titanic was said to be moving 21/22 knots. Too much has been made of the size of Titanic's rudder, though. It may've been just slightly too small, but Titanic's performance capabilities were perfectly acceptable. Here's a good article... http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/articles/rudder_weeks.pdf |
||
Posted on: 2006/7/13 17:45
|
Subject | Poster | Date |
---|---|---|
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/13 0:30 |
Re: faster or slower? | S.A.M. | 2006/7/13 0:37 |
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/13 0:39 |
Re: faster or slower? | TippooTib | 2006/7/13 18:33 |
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/13 22:06 |
Re: faster or slower? | h2oclub | 2006/7/16 8:00 |
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/16 18:54 |
Re: faster or slower? | h2oclub | 2006/7/17 0:14 |
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/17 0:40 |
Re: faster or slower? | S.A.M. | 2006/7/17 4:37 |
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/17 5:41 |
Re: faster or slower? | Anonymous | 2006/7/17 11:59 |
Re: faster or slower? | Titanic King | 2006/7/17 16:17 |
Re: faster or slower? | LeoPlumtree | 2006/7/13 17:45 |
Re: faster or slower? | Anonymous | 2006/7/13 17:50 |
Re: faster or slower? | Martyn | 2006/7/27 0:47 |
Re: faster or slower? | S.A.M. | 2006/7/27 0:51 |
Top Previous Topic Next Topic |
|