Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic movie
   How False/True is it??

Browsing this Thread:   37 Anonymous Users

 

  Bottom    Previous Topic    Next Topic
  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread Rated:  1 Votes
  •  Anonymous
      Anonymous
Re: How False/True is it??
#1
Guest_Anonymous
The titanic movie by James Cameron was the first film in which i saw on the titanic been in my youth at the time. At the time my grandad Christopher Edward Marshall Senior was alive, He was brillent man who loved the Titanic.

When he died he left me some of the research he had collected other the years but some of it just vanished.

I know cameron used a scale moadl of the ship and actual sunk the ships bow under water which was a great effect in the public's mind. The Modal he built was quite accurate with the lengths of all the inferstructure. I think he did a fantastic job.

Althourgh Jack dorson was a engerneer on the titanic and rose didnt exsit. There is a few story's wrong with the film thow and one of them is the fact of isamy by making him out to be a snobby person who cared about speed when in fact he cared more about comfort. Wsl didnt belive in pushing a shipo to its max till the engine bed plates are rested and fully worked in unlike cunard were they push the engines to the max in the first year's of service. The film wasn't a floop unlike raise the titanic becuase the film seemed to be done at almspot the correct time in the eyes of the public.

i have found various parts of the film to be wrong. Like the colour scheme used below decks was as accurate and there is loadz missed out of the story. He got the deparchture almost correct with the 12 oclock leaving time. There is parts of the film which could of been improved like the scene in the actual cargo hold which byb the way the public and firemen didnt have access to

Aswell you can tell certain parts to be folse you see they got parts wrong as they actual made it out like murdock curmitted suewer side which i now hollywood was fined from the ansesters of the man.

In my oppion the titanic was a nice ship which colud of been great for the war effert and the rest and aspecialy help the finace situation of wsl. The film was 60 percent correct but i put my hands up because the story has floors right from 1912 at the incident there isent a correct version but cameron did an ok job
Posted on: 2008/2/19 22:05
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Subject Poster Date
     Re: How False/True is it?? <3 2007/12/2 22:36
       Re: How False/True is it?? pianoprincess 2007/12/2 22:52
         Re: How False/True is it?? <3 2007/12/2 23:00
           Re: How False/True is it?? J Copeland 2007/12/9 20:18
             Re: How False/True is it?? <3 2007/12/9 21:08
     Re: How False/True is it?? SimpsonsGod551 2007/12/27 5:36
       Re: How False/True is it?? SeaRiggs 2008/1/19 12:19
         Re: How False/True is it?? SeaRiggs 2008/1/19 15:32
           Re: How False/True is it?? Anonymous 2008/2/19 22:05
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic

 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box