Well am stuned by that but it is established Pearl harbour is more expensive. In fact i can tell u why they say that the acters all took a cut in their pay for it so price probably would be less than Titanic but after u add it all up again pearl harbour is victorious by a long shoot or maybe u are confusing me with the biggest money maker ever which is Titanic. Or maybe the records book is comparing the initial cost but the end cost was a lot higher for both movies especially pearl.

But in either case they are in for a culture shock. The next potter film is rummoerd to be the most expensive yet that is speculation. But this year speilbergs 'War of the worlds' starring the likes of tom cruise is set to enilalate Titanic not only in budjet but in gross. The marketing men have already started the hype and it is't even finished filming which is taking place as I write this
it is set to be almost double Titanics huge Budjet.

Does the guiness book of records give u both budjets if so tell me cause a will need to tell them and get that amended.

As u said u think u can trust them as I have found there not always right.

Good day Bell