Main Menu
Recent News
Latest Articles
Random photos


Titanic.com - Titanic News, Photos, Articles & Research | Forum Index
   Titanic news
   The Titanic Didnt have to sink......

Browsing this Thread:   21 Anonymous Users

 

  Bottom    Previous Topic    Next Topic
  •  Rate Thread
      Rate this Thread
      Excellent
      Good
      Average
      Bad
      Terrible
Poster Thread
Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink......
#1

Joined: 2004/2/28
From bottom of the ocean near the titanic
Posts: -1
Group:
Registered Users
Offline
if you think about it long enough you might see what we are saying!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Bladefire wrote:
I think you need to study some more The bad rivets on the ship caused the plates of steel to seprate on impact and started filling the first five compartments the pctures alone show that also when strengh test were done on the rivets they failed in three differant test. Quote:

cvco wrote:
Why do people say popping rivots? The iceberg cut 6 thin slits, totalling about 12 sq ft of space and water rushed in at 7 tons per second. By 2AM, 39,000 est. tons had filled the ship, almost the entire weight of the ship itself. And it sank. Thats it.

Quote:

ella m bullock wrote:
In fact it was rivets that popped lose when the boat was hit
_________________
http://www.freewebs.com/titanic_researcher

for titanic avatars here is a good spot for ones of jack rose and the two of them together
http://www.fortunecity.com/lavendar/casablanca/110/titanic.h...
Posted on: 2004/11/18 17:10
Create PDF from Post Print
Top
Subject Poster Date
     Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... Anonymous 2004/11/9 16:14
       Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/9 22:22
         Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... ella m bullock 2004/11/9 22:28
           Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/9 23:48
             Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... ella m bullock 2004/11/10 0:02
               Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... Anonymous 2004/11/10 1:16
                 Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/11 0:18
                   Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... Kitavi 2004/11/12 5:00
                     Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/12 22:16
                       Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... titanic over 2004/11/13 2:03
                         Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/13 5:54
                         Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/13 5:55
           Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... cvco 2004/11/13 12:08
             Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/13 22:08
             Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... Anonymous 2004/11/16 22:49
               Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... ella m bullock 2004/11/18 17:10
                 Re: The Titanic Didnt have to sink...... rose89 2004/11/18 22:19
 Top   Previous Topic   Next Topic

 


 You cannot start a new topic.
 You can view topic.
 You cannot reply to posts.
 You cannot edit your posts.
 You cannot delete your posts.
 You cannot add new polls.
 You cannot vote in polls.
 You cannot attach files to posts.
 You cannot post without approval.



Copyright © 2006-2012 Titanic.com
Home Photos Advertise Link to us Flower Box